When Brooks launched the Glycerin Max in December of 2024, it looked and felt completely different from any other shoe- not only in Brooks’ line-up but also any shoe on the market. With its pronounced rocker and introducing the brand’s new DNA-tuned nitrogen-injected midsole foam (alongside the standard Glycerin and GTS models), the new shoe became a quick favourite for runners who wanted a max cushion shoe, but one that could also handle faster sessions when necessary.
Now, the Glycerin Max 2 isn’t a complete revamp of the shoe; instead, Brooks opted to change a few elements, which, for some people, has now altered the shoe’s versatility.
Similarities include keeping the 6mm offset, which, paired with the exaggerated rocker, helps to encourage a consistent mid-foot striking pattern and therefore a smoother, more efficient running gait at both endurance paces and faster paces.
Brooks keeps their popular DNA-tuned nitrogen-injected cushioning. However, Brooks has seemed to make the forefoot cushioning firmer, giving less of the “sink and rebound” feeling with each step. This firmer structure, though, offers greater stability and reduces any rotational issues, craddling and supporting the foot more upon landing, but this can be a detriment as some of the softness is lost.
The Glycerin Max 2 is slightly narrower- especially around the toe box. The tapered nature of this pair may be apparent to those who have worn the previous model. The base of the shoe remains significantly wider than many other max-cushioned shoes, again helping to aid stability.
The shoe has become slightly heavier by 22 grams, solidifying that this is aimed more at recovery and easy running than an all-rounder non-plated “super trainer”. This extra weight can be found around the thicker heel counter and the laces. Even so, the redesigned upper makes this model surprisingly more breathable.
Overall, it seems Brooks has made a deliberate move to make this shoe their definitive easy and long run shoe. It can still be used for those occasional faster sessions, and for runners looking for one pair that can be used for most training runs, or those training for any ultra-marathons; this remains a good option.
At £180, it’s not the cheapest in Brook’s range, but it is priced in line with similar shoes from other brands. If it is a little expensive, there are a few alternatives that offer comfort for a few less pennies-
Hoka Bondi 9 (£160)
Saucony Hurricane 25 (£165)
Brooks Glycerin/GTS 23 (£165)